Today's AI/ML headlines are brought to you by ThreatPerspective

Digital Event Horizon

US House Republicans Sneak in Decade-Long AI Regulation Ban: A Threat to State-Level Oversight


US House Republicans Sneak in Decade-Long AI Regulation Ban: A Threat to State-Level Oversight

  • House Republicans have added a provision to the Budget Reconciliation bill that would block state and local governments from regulating AI for the next 10 years.
  • This ban covers existing laws as well as new legislation, potentially invalidating recent state laws on AI regulation.
  • The provision could also restrict how states allocate federal funding for AI programs, allowing the White House to dictate priorities.
  • Experts warn that this ban would undermine trust in government and erode democracy, as it was added without public input or debate.
  • The move is seen as a "giant gift to Big Tech" and has been criticized by organizations like the Tech Oversight Project and Consumer Reports.



  • The latest development in the ongoing saga of artificial intelligence (AI) regulation in the United States has left many experts and lawmakers alike scratching their heads. In a move that has been described as a "giant gift to Big Tech," House Republicans have secretly added language to the Budget Reconciliation bill that would block all state and local governments from regulating AI for the next 10 years.

    This provision, introduced by Representative Brett Guthrie of Kentucky, may seem like a minor addition at first glance. However, its implications are far-reaching and could have significant consequences for the future of AI regulation in the United States.

    The proposed ban is broad in scope, covering not only existing laws but also any new legislation that states may try to pass to regulate AI in the coming years. This means that California's recent law requiring healthcare providers to disclose when they use generative AI to communicate with patients would potentially become unenforceable, as would New York's 2021 law mandating bias audits for AI tools used in hiring decisions.

    Furthermore, this provision could also halt legislation set to take effect in 2026 in California that requires AI developers to publicly document the data used to train their models. This is a significant concern, given the growing importance of transparency and accountability in AI development.

    But what's even more troubling is that this ban could restrict how states allocate federal funding for AI programs. Currently, states have control over how they use federal dollars and can direct funding toward AI initiatives that may conflict with the administration's technology priorities. However, under the proposed ban, this would be severely curtailed, potentially allowing the White House to dictate what types of AI research and development receive funding.

    The implications of this provision are not limited to AI regulation alone. This kind of legislative sleight-of-hand has serious consequences for the democratic process as a whole. When lawmakers sneak in provisions like this without public input or debate, it can erode trust in government and undermine the very foundations of our democracy.

    In recent years, we have seen an increasing trend of Big Tech companies cozying up to politicians and shaping policy around their interests. This is not unique to AI regulation; it's a broader phenomenon that affects many areas of technology policy. However, when it comes to AI specifically, this trend has taken on a particularly alarming tone.

    The fact that President Trump has already reversed several Biden-era executive orders on AI safety and risk mitigation suggests that the White House is deeply invested in promoting an industry-friendly approach to AI policy. This is precisely what we see happening with the proposed ban on state-level AI regulation.

    By limiting states' authority over AI regulation, this provision would prevent state governments from using federal funds to develop AI oversight programs or support initiatives that diverge from the administration's deregulatory stance. This restriction would extend beyond enforcement to potentially affect how states design and fund their own AI governance frameworks.

    The Tech Oversight Project and Consumer Reports have already criticized this proposal, warning that it would leave consumers unprotected from AI harms like deepfakes and bias. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) has also spoken out against the provision, calling it a "giant gift to Big Tech."

    As we move forward in an era where AI is increasingly becoming an integral part of our lives, it's more important than ever that we have robust and effective mechanisms for regulating its use. This includes state-level oversight, which provides a necessary check on the power of the federal government.

    The proposed ban on state-level AI regulation is a clear example of how Big Tech companies are pushing their interests forward without regard for public concern or democratic process. It's up to us, as citizens and lawmakers, to push back against this trend and ensure that our democracy remains robust and resilient in the face of technological change.

    US House Republicans Sneak in Decade-Long AI Regulation Ban: A Threat to State-Level Oversight



    Related Information:
  • https://www.digitaleventhorizon.com/articles/US-House-Republicans-Sneak-in-Decade-Long-AI-Regulation-Ban-A-Threat-to-State-Level-Oversight-deh.shtml

  • https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/05/gop-sneaks-decade-long-ai-regulation-ban-into-spending-bill/


  • Published: Tue May 13 10:44:51 2025 by llama3.2 3B Q4_K_M











    © Digital Event Horizon . All rights reserved.

    Privacy | Terms of Use | Contact Us