Digital Event Horizon
A Condé Nast user database breach has been reported, with more than 2.3 million WIRED user records leaked. However, Ars Technica users are unlikely to be impacted due to the company's custom-built tech stack. The hacker, Lovely, has announced plans to release an additional 40 million records for other Condé Nast properties.
Ars Technica's sister publication WIRED was affected by a data breach that released over 2.3 million user records. The breach is attributed to a hacker named Lovely, who also threatened to release 40 million more records from other Condé Nast properties. Condé Nast's security has been questioned due to their slow response and lack of communication about the hack. Ars Technica was not affected by the breach due to its custom-built tech stack, highlighting the need for robust security measures.
Ars Technica, a leading technology and science publication, has been affected by a data breach of its sister publication WIRED's user database. However, Ars users are unlikely to be impacted as the company runs on its own bespoke tech stack. The breach is attributed to a hacker named Lovely who claimed to have breached Condé Nast's user database and released a list of more than 2.3 million user records from WIRED.
The leaked materials contain demographic information such as name, email, address, phone number, etc., but no passwords. Additionally, Lovely announced that they would release an additional 40 million records for other Condé Nast properties, including Vogue, The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, and more. This alarming statement has left many in the industry questioning the security of Condé Nast's user data.
In a statement, DataBreaches.Net revealed that Lovely misled them into believing that they were trying to help patch vulnerabilities when, in reality, they are a "cybercriminal" looking for a payout. It is unclear whether Lovely's motives were truly altruistic or not. The fact that Condé Nast has not issued a statement and Ars has not been informed internally of the hack suggests that the company may be trying to downplay the severity of the situation.
Condé Nast's failure to address the issue in a timely manner has raised concerns about their commitment to user security. As stated by Hudson Rock's InfoStealers, "Condé Nast should never pay them a dime, and no one else should ever, as their word clearly cannot be trusted." The incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of prioritizing user data protection in the digital age.
The fact that Ars Technica was not affected by the breach is largely due to its custom-built tech stack. This highlights the need for companies to invest in robust security measures and consider alternative solutions that prioritize user data protection.
In conclusion, while it is unclear what prompted Lovely's actions, one thing is certain – Condé Nast's failure to address this issue effectively has raised serious concerns about their commitment to user security. As users, it is essential to be aware of these types of incidents and take proactive measures to protect ourselves from similar breaches.
Related Information:
https://www.digitaleventhorizon.com/articles/A-Cond-Nast-User-Database-Breach-The-Uncertain-Motive-Behind-the-Leak-deh.shtml
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/12/conde-nast-user-database-reportedly-breached-ars-unaffected/
Published: Sat Jan 3 19:26:27 2026 by llama3.2 3B Q4_K_M
